Like most websites, we use cookies to make our website function properly and improve our services. You can read how to manage and delete cookies here or accept cookies by continuing to browse our website as usual and clicking the Continue button to remove this message.

Corporate Secretary


Bankruptcy salary roll back could become a trend

Comments (0) | 13 Apr 2012 | RatingRating (-1 to +1): 0.0

Is Hostess’ salary roll back good for governance?

Hostess Brands’ announcement that it would roll back pay increases for top managers in the wake of its recent bankruptcy is welcome news in governance circles for those who would like to see compensation more closely tied to performance.

In this case, however, Hostess didn’t exactly make the move willingly. It took the company going into bankruptcy and a revolt by unions during renegotiations of its pension and benefits to get the company to rescind planned raises, which were as much as 80 percent up on previous salaries.

The Wall Street Journal reported this week that eight of the company’s top executives agreed to change their salaries after Hostess was accused of raising their pay to circumvent bankruptcy rules that prevent companies from paying executives to stay on. The raises were given out just last summer.

Clawback rules that the SEC is still in the process of finalizing may eventually help prevent similar transgressions at marginally performing companies that give outsized raises for undersized performance. Shareholders need such protection to stop executives from raiding a company’s finances even if they don’t drive the company into bankruptcy.

However, in the case of Hostess, perhaps what the company did could begin a trend.

CEO Gregory Rayburn, who took over the company just last month, had his top four executives accept $1 salaries until December 31, or until the company emerges from bankruptcy, whichever comes first; and four other executives had their salaries rolled back to previous levels.

Making executives accountable by reducing or eliminating their salaries until the problem they caused is rectified seems like a healthy disincentive to dissuade them from engaging in activities that threaten the life of the company. While it’s not the first time such a move has been made, Hostess’ recovery from bankruptcy should be watched to see if such measures make the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process move more smoothly.

cs-registration cs-subscribe
Rating (-1 to +1): 0.0

You must be signed-in to rate this article

Reader Comments (0)

Be the first to comment and kickstart the debate!

You must be registered to comment.

Please Sign In or Register.

Read More About Topics

Corporate Secretary Week

Our free weekly email newsletters are an essential bulletin of GRC updates, insight and information.

Our experienced journalists provide relevant, timely information and analysis that will keep you at the forefront of industry developments and best practice.

Sign-up to receive your copy when you register with the Corporate Secretary website for free.

Featured Articles

Should the chair and CEO roles be split?
CEO/chair role may undermine...
More

How Pershing Square has changed proxy fights
Activist investor William Ackman forced...
More

Making a smooth transition to board portals
Walk each director through...
More