How boards can approach the Covid-19 pandemic
The Covid-19 pandemic presents complex issues for corporations and their boards of directors to navigate. This briefing is intended to provide a high-level overview of the types of issues boards of both public and private companies may find useful to focus on in the current environment.
Management bears the day-to-day responsibility for handling the corporation’s response to the pandemic. The board’s role is one of oversight, which requires monitoring management activity, assessing whether management is taking appropriate action and providing additional guidance and direction to the extent that the board determines is prudent. Staying well informed of developments within the corporation as well as the rapidly changing situation provides the foundation for board effectiveness.
We highlight below some key areas of focus for boards as this unprecedented public health crisis and its impact on the business and economic environment rapidly evolves.
1. Health and safety
Along with management, set a tone at the top through communications and policies designed to protect employee well-being and act responsibly to slow the spread of Covid-19. Monitor management’s efforts to support containment of the disease and thereby protect the personal health and safety of employees, their families, customers, business partners and the public at large. Consider how to mitigate the economic impact on employees of absences due to illness as well as closures of certain operations.
2. Operational and risk oversight
Monitor management’s efforts to identify, prioritize and manage potentially significant risks to business operations, including through more regular updates from management between regularly scheduled board meetings. Depending on the nature of the risk impact, this may be a role for the audit or risk committee or may be more appropriately undertaken by the full board.
Document the board’s consideration of, and decisions regarding, Covid-19-related matters in meeting minutes. Maintain a focus on oversight of compliance risks, particularly at highly regulated companies. Watch for vulnerabilities caused by the outbreak that may increase the risk of a cyber-security breach.
3. Business continuity
Consider whether business continuity plans in place are appropriate to the potential risks of disruption identified – including through a discussion with management of relevant contingencies – and continually reassess the adequacy of the plans in light of developments. Key issues to consider include:
- Employee/talent disruption. As more employees begin working remotely or are unable to work due to disruptions caused by Covid-19, continually assess what minimum staffing levels and remote work technology will be required to maintain operations. Also, as noted above, consider how to mitigate the economic impact on employees of absences due to illness as well as closures of certain operations
- Supply chain and production disruption. Review with management the risks that a disruption in the supply chain will cause interruptions in operations and how to protect against such risks, including the availability of alternate sources of supply. Ask management to assess the risks that the company will have difficulty fulfilling its contractual obligations and how management is preparing to address those risks, including through review of relevant provisions in customer contracts, such as force majeure, events of default and termination, to determine what recourse is available
- Financial impact and liquidity. Review with management the near-term and longer-term financial impact (including the ability to meet obligations) of the Covid-19 pandemic and the related impact of the extreme volatility in the financial markets. Understand the assumptions underlying management’s assessment and discuss the likely outcome if those assumptions prove incorrect. Consider the need to seek additional financing or amend the terms of existing debt arrangements
- Internal controls and audit function. Consider whether Covid-19 may have an impact on the functioning of internal controls and audit. For publicly traded companies, remember that any material changes in internal control over financial reporting will require disclosure in the next periodic report. In a March 4, 2020 press release, SEC chair Jay Clayton urged companies to work with their audit committees and auditors to ensure their financial reporting, auditing and review processes are sufficiently robust to enable them to meet their obligations under the federal securities laws in the current environment
- Key person risks and emergency succession plans. Consider whether an up-to-date emergency succession plan is in place that identifies a person who can step in immediately as interim CEO in the event the CEO contracts Covid-19. Consider the need to implement similar plans for other key people
- Incentives. Consider whether incentive plans need to be reworked in light of the circumstances to ensure that appropriate behaviors are encouraged. Consider delaying setting incentive plan goals until the uncertainty has subsided or try to build in flexibility with respect to any goals set
- Board/governance continuity. Consider whether the board is appropriately positioned to provide guidance and oversight as the Covid-19 threat expands. Consider scheduling in advance special board meetings and/or information conference calls over the next three to four months, which can be cancelled if not needed. Decide whether to replace in-person meetings with conference calls to help limit the threat of contagion. Consider whether contingencies are in place if a board quorum is not available. Continue to meet regularly in executive session to discuss assessment of how management is managing the crisis.
4. Crisis management
During this turbulent time, employees, shareholders and other stakeholders will look to boards to take swift and decisive action when necessary. Consider whether an up-to-date crisis management plan is in place and effective. A well-designed plan will assist the company to react appropriately, without either under or over-reacting. Elements of an effective crisis management plan include:
- Cross-functional team. Crisis response teams typically include key individuals from management, public relations, human resources, legal and finance. Identify these individuals now and begin meeting so they are prepared to respond quickly as the crisis develops. The team should be in regular contact with the board, or a designated board member or committee, as the Covid-19 pandemic evolves
- Quick and decisive deployment. The plan should include crisis response procedures, communications templates, checklists and manuals that can be readily adapted to a variety of situations for effective, time-critical and agile deployment. The crisis response team should be familiar with the elements of the plan and ready to implement it at a moment’s notice
- Contingency plans. A crisis is inherently unpredictable but the company should endeavor to anticipate all potential crises to which it is vulnerable and develop contingency plans to deal with those crises to minimize on-the-fly decision-making. Examples of scenarios to prepare for include: what will our response be if there is a confirmed case of Covid-19 within the company? How will we notify employees of a confirmed case and what privacy implications do we need to consider? What planning, such as IT training, is required if we need to mandate that our employees work remotely?
- Thoughtful communications. The board should oversee the company’s communication strategy. Clear communication and planning within the crisis response team will allow the company to communicate internally and externally in a calm and thoughtful manner, which will help build confidence during a volatile situation.
5. Oversight of public reporting and disclosure for publicly traded companies
Companies must consider whether they are making sufficient public disclosures about the actual and expected impacts of Covid-19 on their business and financial condition. The level of disclosure required will depend on many factors, such as whether a company has significant operations in China or is in a highly affected industry, such as airlines and hospitality companies. In any event, boards should monitor to ensure that corporate disclosures are accurate and complete and reflect the changing circumstances.
The Covid-19 pandemic is unprecedented and changing by the day, and the SEC acknowledges that it is challenging to provide accurate information about the impact it could have on future operations. In a recent statement, Clayton says: ‘We recognize that [the current and potential effects of Covid-19] may be difficult to assess or predict with meaningful precision both generally and as an industry or issuer-specific basis.’
- Earnings guidance. Consider whether previously issued earnings guidance should be downgraded to reflect the actual or likely impact of Covid-19 and, if so, how to describe the reason for the revision. Due to the current unpredictability of Covid-19’s impact, consider withdrawing previously issued earnings guidance altogether or refraining from issuing guidance in the near term.
- Risk factor disclosure. Consider how the Covid-19 pandemic may require additions or revisions to risk factor disclosures. In the March 4 press release, Clayton states: ‘We also remind all companies to provide investors with insight regarding their assessment of, and plans for addressing, material risks to their business and operations resulting from the coronavirus to the fullest extent practicable to keep investors and markets informed of material developments.’
Potential topics for risk factor disclosure include:
- Disruptions to business operations whether from travel restrictions, mandated quarantines or voluntary ‘social distancing’ that affects employees, customers and suppliers, production delays, closures of manufacturing facilities, warehouses and logistics supply and distribution chains and staffing shortages
- Uncertainty regarding global macroeconomic conditions, particularly the uncertainty related to the duration and impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, and related decreases in customer demand and spending
- Credit and liquidity risk, loan defaults and covenant breaches
- Inventory write-downs and impairment losses.
Ensure that risk factor disclosure is consistent with the board’s conversations with management about material risks. In a March 15 statement, SEC division of corporation finance director William Hinman says: ‘One analytical tool to evaluate disclosure in this context is to consider how management discusses… risks with its board of directors. Obviously not all discussions between management and the board are appropriate for disclosure in public filings, but there should not be material gaps between how the board is briefed and how shareholders are informed.’
As always, risk-factor disclosure should be specific to a company’s individual circumstances and avoid generic language. Finally, be careful not to describe a risk related to Covid-19 as hypothetical if it has actually occurred.
- Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A). Consider whether the actual or likely impact of Covid-19 on a company’s business, including its supply chain, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and/or prospects would be deemed material to an investment decision in the company’s securities and require disclosure. Consider whether the impact or potential impact of Covid-19 on the company is a ‘known trend or uncertainty’ requiring disclosure in the MD&A of the next periodic report. Tailor any MD&A disclosures to the impact of Covid-19 on the company’s business in particular. Consider whether disclosures appropriately address the potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on future results or operations.
- Subsequent events. A joint statement by the SEC and PCAOB leadership on February 19, 2020 specific to Covid-19 reporting considerations encouraged companies to consider the need to potentially disclose subsequent events in the notes to the financial statements in accordance with guidance included in Accounting Standards Codification 855, Subsequent Events.
- Forward-looking statements. Consider whether the company’s forward-looking statement disclaimer language adequately protects the company for statements it makes regarding the expected impacts of Covid-19. It should be specific and consistent with updates made to the risk factors and other public disclosures. Clayton says in the March 4 release: ‘Companies providing forward-looking information in an effort to keep investors informed about material developments, including known trends or uncertainties regarding the coronavirus, can take steps to avail themselves of the safe harbor in Section 21E of the Exchange Act for this information.
- Updates. Consider whether prior disclosures should be revised to ensure they are accurate and complete. Although there is no express duty to update a forward-looking statement, courts are divided as to whether a duty to update exists for a forward-looking statement that becomes inaccurate or misleading after the passage of time, from the perspective of claim under Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. The SEC’s March 4 release states: ‘Depending on a company’s particular circumstances, it should consider whether it may need to revisit, refresh or update previous disclosure to the extent that the information becomes materially inaccurate.’
- Proxy statements. Given the SEC’s emphasis on discussion of how boards oversee the management of material risks, consider expanding the proxy statement disclosure of board oversight of Covid-19-related risks where material to the business.
Hinman states in his March 15 comments: ‘To the extent a matter presents a material risk to a company’s business, the company’s disclosure should discuss the nature of the board’s role in overseeing the management of that risk. The commission last noted this in the context of cyber-security, when it stated that disclosure about a company’s risk-management program and how the board engages with the company on cyber-security risk management allows investors to better assess how the board is discharging its risk oversight function. Parallels may be drawn to other areas where companies face emerging or uncertain risks, so companies may find this guidance useful when preparing disclosures about the ways in which the board manages risks, such as those related to sustainability or other matters.’
Also, consider cautioning stockholders that the annual meeting date and logistics are subject to change.
- Current reports. Consider the need to file a Form 8K for material developments such as if the CEO or another key person or a significant portion of the workforce contracts Covid-19.
- Conditional filing relief. Companies that anticipate filing delays due to Covid-19 should consider taking advantage of the SEC’s March 4, 2020 order granting an additional 45 days to meet Exchange Act reporting obligations for reports due between March 1 and April 30, 2020.
6. Compliance with insider trading restrictions and Regulation FD for public companies
- Insider trading. Closely monitor and consider further restricting trading in company securities by insiders who may have access to material non-public information related to Covid-19 impacts – for example, by requiring additional training, imposing blackout periods or enhancing preclearance procedures.
The SEC states in its March 4 release that if a company ‘become[s] aware of a risk related to the coronavirus that would be material to its investors, it should refrain from engaging in securities transactions with the public and… take steps to prevent directors and officers (and other corporate insiders who are aware of these matters) from initiating such transactions until investors have been appropriately informed about the risk.’
Carefully consider whether the company should potentially buy back stock to take advantage of significantly depressed stock prices.
- Regulation FD. Be mindful of Regulation FD requirements, particularly if sharing information related to the impact of Covid-19 with customers and other stakeholders. The SEC states in its March 4 release: ‘When companies do disclose material information related to the impacts of the coronavirus, they are reminded to take the necessary steps to avoid selective disclosures and to disseminate such information broadly.’
7. Annual shareholder meeting
With the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommending that gatherings of 50 or more people be avoided to assist in containment of the virus, consider with management whether to hold a virtual-only shareholders meeting or a hybrid meeting that permits both in-person and online attendance.
Public companies that are considering changing the date, time and/or location of an annual meeting, including a switch from an in-person meeting to a virtual or hybrid meeting, will need to review applicable requirements under state law, stock exchange rules and the company’s charter and bylaws. Companies that change the date, time and/or location of an annual meeting should comply with the March 13, 2020 guidance issued by the SEC’s divisions of corporation finance and investment management.
8. Shareholder relations, activism and hostile situations
Continue to ensure communication with, and stay attuned to the concerns of, significant shareholders, while monitoring for changes in stock ownership. Capital redemptions at small and mid-sized funds may lead to fewer shareholder activism campaigns and proxy contests in the next several months. But expect well-capitalized activists to exploit the enhanced vulnerability of target companies. The same applies to unsolicited takeovers bids by well-capitalized strategic buyers. If they have not already done so, boards should update or activate defense preparation plans, including by identifying special proxy fight counsel, reviewing structural defenses, putting a poison pill ‘on the shelf’ and developing a ‘break the glass’ communications plan.
9. Strategic opportunities
Consider with management whether – and if so, where – opportunities are likely to emerge that are aligned with the corporation’s strategy. For example, opportunities to fulfill an unmet need occasioned by the pandemic or opportunities for growth through distressed M&A.
Consider with management whether the changes in behavior occasioned by the pandemic will have any potential lasting effects – for example, on employee and consumer behavior and expectations. Also, be prepared when the crisis abates to assess the corporation’s handling of the situation and identify ‘lessons learned’ and actionable ideas for improvement.
Holly Gregory, John Kelsh and Thomas Kim are partners in the corporate governance practice of Sidley Austin